Most observers who have watched the City of Seattle self-immolate with absurd public policies, exploding crime, drug addiction, virtue-signaling, and other destructive politically-imposed plans often wonder how is it possible for serious public officials to be so self-destructive. Or, to be clear, while these elected officials and bureaucrats may be ensuring their personal career path is protected, they certainly have far less concern for the damage they are inflicting on their community.
The total lack of concern by the local elected officials for the clear and obvious damage they are doing to their community, and their same lack of seriousness when it comes to solving local problems has created a wide variety of theories by Washington State residents who believe it is impossible to be THIS incompetent and fail so consistently. It isn’t possible to find people who are SO crazy, SO useless, and who SO CONSISTENTLY fail to help their community. I mean, even if they just randomly picked decisions out of a hat every day, at least SOMETIMES they would do SOMETHING that helps. Right?
TO RECEIVE THE LATEST NEWS FROM WE THE GOVERNED DELIVERED STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX – SUBSCRIBE HERE
Support We the Governed – MAKE A DONATION HERE
Is it possible for the City Council in Seattle to make things worse than they already are striving to do? Would things be worse if the City of Seattle was controlled by Mexican Drug Cartels, for example? In fact, are the policies implemented, cheered, and funded today in the City of Seattle be any different if the city were openly (or quietly) run by International Drug Cartels? We explore that question in this video:
OUR CONSTITUTION BEGINS WITH THE PHRASE “WE THE PEOPLE.” IT WAS THE FOUNDERS’ INTENT THAT GOVERNMENT BE CREATED BY THE PEOPLE, TO SERVE THE PEOPLE. IT WASN’T THEIR INTENTION FOR THE PEOPLE TO SERVE THE GOVERNMENT. IT WAS ALWAYS INTENDED THAT GOVERNMENT WHICH FAILED TO SERVE THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE “ALTERED OR ABOLISHED.” UNTIL WE RETURN TO THE FOUNDER’S INTENT, WE REMAIN WE THE GOVERNED…
Background articles and reference links:
If Seattle’s Tourism Bureau was honest (Video)
Ride Seattle’s Public Transit! Where only the suckers pay the fare (video)
What do you mean if ? pretty obvious isnt it
The strongest argument against the theory that Mexican Drug Cartels run the City of Seattle is this: IF Drug Cartels ran the City of Seattle – it would actually be run far more efficiently and more effectively than it is being run now. This is the argument to overcome.
Well its indirect control because there is no difference between the false CCP BIDEN ADMINISTRATION , Inslee regime, the border invasion, which smuggles the drugs straight up the pipeline and those in control of this state , which are Gates , Bezos, Boeing, and military. Looks to me like they are being very effective at their intention which is Totalitarian destruction. I have always disagreed with your perception of so much of this as “incompetence” even repeated incompetence shows intention.
Could be. We need to keep digging
Glen this is brilliant. They used LA as their Guinea pig. And they moved up the Pacific Coast; through San Fran and then Portland with the help of Antifa; onward to Seattle and Vancouver Canada. Maybe, their West Coast attack reached a crescendo with free drugs payed for by the government!
Yeah, there is something fishy going on for sure. One thing pointed out to me by others – making the strongest case AGAINST the possibility that Drug Cartels control the City of Seattle is the fact that Cartels would actually be far more effective and efficient and probably less incompetent than the existing city council gang.
Government is the branch of organized crime that has managed to legalize itself.
It certainly has become difficult to distinguish what local government policies would be different if the City of Seattle was openly run by Mexican Drug Cartels.
True dat. 🙂
“how is it possible for serious public officials to be so self-destructive?”
It’s possible because of the underlying philosophy that is being embraces — not just by the officials, but by the majority of voters who place them there. The people of Seattle deserve the results they get because they have rejected a rational, individualistic, fact-based philosophy in favor of a subjective, primacy-of-consciousness, collectivist one. The results are clear and completely predictable to anyone who thinks in principle.
“who SO CONSISTENTLY fail to help their community.”
Maybe we should go back to first principles and ask what, specifically, is meant by “helping” one’s community? Of course, defining one’s terms and one’s goals is precisely against the prevailing philosophy (postmodernism) that rejects values outright. This might lead to questioning the actual nature of government and whether it has any business engaging in many of the things it currently does, and few people wants that! Unfortunately.
Obviously, you never attended the Evergreen State College where they would have driven such thoughts from your mind or you from their campus.
Comments are closed.